Home › Forums › Photography Q&A › Do I need a second lens, and if so, which one? › Reply To: Do I need a second lens, and if so, which one?
Thanks so much for all of your input!
So… the Canon 50mm 1.8 is in my shopping cart right now (couldn’t beat the price!), but I was given some more money for my birthday to add to my photo budget.
I’m now looking for an ultra-wide. I already have an 18mm (at f/3.5) option on my 18-200mm.
So far, I’ve come across two different options.
Option 1: The Tokina 11-16mm f/2.8 AT-X116 Pro DX II
Pros that I can see:
-Autofocus
-Versatility (it zooms a bit)
-Nice wide Aperture (beats my f/3.5 by 2/3 stop)
Cons that I can see:
-Glass quality might be a bit compromised
-I hear this lens isn’t super great with Chromatic Aberration :/ (https://www.the-digital-picture.com/Reviews/Tokina-11-16mm-f-2.8-AT-X-Pro-DX-II-Lens.aspx)
-Autofocus is a bit slow—I don’t really care about that though
Option 2: Rokinon 16M-C 16mm f/2.0
Pros:
-SHARP througout the whole lens (even in the corners)
-Lovely Aperture (f/2.0)
-Especially recommended for astrophotography
-Price is about the same as the Tokina, but fewer features might imply better glass quality
Cons:
-Manual Aperture lens—don’t know that I’d be too concerned about that (I shoot in Aperture Priority mode all the time), though I’d miss the EXIF data.
-No Autofocus—is this a big deal on an ultrawide?
-No zoom… I could probably live with that though
-Is 16mm that much different than 18mm? This lens isn’t a lot wider than the lens I already own.
So… what say y’all? Is there a third option you’d recommend?
Thanks!
–Logan
- This reply was modified 54 years, 9 months ago by .