Home › Forums › Photo Critique › Tigré du Canada (Sorry, English Speakers)
- This topic has 8 replies, 5 voices, and was last updated 10 years, 5 months ago by
Ezra Morley.
-
AuthorPosts
-
October 8, 2014 at 6:24 pm #7760
Mr. Quebec
ParticipantOctober 9, 2014 at 8:08 am #7764tjons
ParticipantBeautiful shot. Have you sharpened this?
October 9, 2014 at 2:13 pm #7766timtam
ParticipantNear perfect shot. A lower ISO would have been a little better and maybe f8 at 1/500 sec.
- This reply was modified 55 years, 3 months ago by .
October 9, 2014 at 5:20 pm #7768Ezra Morley
ModeratorWow, that is a nice shot! I would try lowering the blacks a little, and maybe some additional sharpening, as @tjons mentioned.
Just wondering, how do you resize your pictures? I wonder if it just looks soft as a result of the resizing algorithm. You might try experimenting with different software, and see if you can get better looking results. I personally use FastImageResizer which is really simple and easy to use. You can download it here. It does a great job, and is so simple, as you don’t have to open a program, click ‘resize’, set the dimensions, apply, save, and so on. Just drag your picture over the window, and presto, it’s resized!
October 9, 2014 at 6:52 pm #7769Mr. Quebec
ParticipantThanks everyone.
I lowered the blacks, and added some sharpening, but I have been very careful about this one because sharpening in my Windows Live Gallery is very cheap and the picture will soon turn very grainy if sharpening is pulled a little too much…
I resized this picture in Windows Live Gallery, but I don’t think the soft look came from resizing because in my original picture the subject is soft on the edges too. To my opinion, I think it may be a lens issue, since I was zoomed to 250mm on my 55-250mm lens.- This reply was modified 55 years, 3 months ago by .
October 10, 2014 at 7:24 am #7783James Staddon
KeymasterI would agree it’s a lens issue on the sharpness. I would also agree that this the shot is an excellent one, well composed and well edited.
In the future, try starting at 1/500sec and see if that is fast enough to capture the action. If not go up to 1/1000sec. It would be better to do this than have such a high ISO, which factors into the sharpness as well.
October 10, 2014 at 9:31 am #7787Ezra Morley
ModeratorI would also agree that this the shot is an excellent one, well composed and well edited.
I agree with you James, good job @mr-quebec!
I would agree it’s a lens issue on the sharpness.
I don’t know that I agree with that though. 🙂 All that I can see ‘wrong’ with the picture is that the tips of the wings are blurry. That to me just looks like the depth-of-field is too small to get the whole butterfly in focus. The only “solution” would be either: Raise the aperture, or decrease the focal length, either of which will increase the DOF. I would say, considering the focal length used, I’m surprised how much of the butterfly is in focus! And the parts that are in focus, are really quite sharp.
October 10, 2014 at 6:21 pm #7800Mr. Quebec
ParticipantI know what you mean, buddingphotographer. The tips of the wings are not in focus probably because of the low aperture and/or focal length.
But when I talked about soft look, I was referring to the softness of details in focus that were not tack sharp.About the camera settings, I agree that they are not ideal, even though the picture is still good. It is an old picture, and I was then much less experienced.
October 10, 2014 at 8:22 pm #7802Ezra Morley
ModeratorOk, I see. I can’t really judge on sharpness, as all we can see is a downscaled version.
-
AuthorPosts
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.