<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Lenspiration | Abigail Blackstone | Mentions</title>
	<link>https://www.lenspiration.com/members/alaskabirder/activity/mentions/</link>
	<atom:link href="https://www.lenspiration.com/members/alaskabirder/activity/mentions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Activity feed mentioning Abigail Blackstone.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2026 14:20:12 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>https://buddypress.org/?v=</generator>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<ttl>30</ttl>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>2</sy:updateFrequency>
	
						<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">2426f1d206b127a8b294738f96954802</guid>
				<title>Ezra Morley replied to the topic Canon 100-400mm Issues in the forum Photography Q&#038;A</title>
				<link>https://www.lenspiration.com/forums/topic/canon-100-400mm-issues/page/2/#post-10969</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2015 01:11:42 -0400</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I might add to <a href="https://www.lenspiration.com/members/nasa/" rel="nofollow ugc">@nasa</a> &#8216;s warning about a new camera body, just because a friend has a body that allows micro-adjusting doesn&#8217;t really help <a href="https://www.lenspiration.com/members/alaskabirder/" rel="nofollow ugc">@alaskabirder</a> any, as far as making the lens usable with her current camera. Micro-adjustments are saved in the camera body, not the lens. (Maybe you already realized that, I just wanted to make sure!)</p>
<p>BTW,&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-436"><a href="https://www.lenspiration.com/forums/topic/canon-100-400mm-issues/page/2/#post-10969" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">04e39273df289c57e7fb6fccab8fc562</guid>
				<title>Ezra Morley replied to the topic Canon 100-400mm Issues in the forum Photography Q&#038;A</title>
				<link>https://www.lenspiration.com/forums/topic/canon-100-400mm-issues/#post-10928</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2015 15:22:49 -0400</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I also requested access as <a href="mailto:buddingphotographer123@gmail.com" rel="nofollow ugc">buddingphotographer123@gmail.com</a> As <a href="https://www.lenspiration.com/members/jamesstaddon/" rel="nofollow ugc">@JamesStaddon</a> said, you could just make it Public so anyone can view them.</p>
<p>I think I would agree with your opinion James, about the T3, but that still doesn&#8217;t explain why every once in a while you get a perfectly good shot!</p>
<p><a href="https://www.lenspiration.com/members/alaskabirder/" rel="nofollow ugc">@alaskabirder</a>, you would likely see an improvement by&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-421"><a href="https://www.lenspiration.com/forums/topic/canon-100-400mm-issues/#post-10928" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>