<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Lenspiration | Liz | Mentions</title>
	<link>https://www.lenspiration.com/members/izzyb/activity/mentions/</link>
	<atom:link href="https://www.lenspiration.com/members/izzyb/activity/mentions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Activity feed mentioning Liz.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2026 19:19:29 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>https://buddypress.org/?v=</generator>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<ttl>30</ttl>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>2</sy:updateFrequency>
	
						<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">c55213b4be5bb8506dfe3e11991b0b51</guid>
				<title>Lyd-B replied to the topic Water fall in the forum Photo Critique</title>
				<link>https://www.lenspiration.com/forums/topic/water-fall/#post-38539</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 12 Apr 2019 15:49:06 -0400</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://www.lenspiration.com/members/izzyb/" rel="nofollow ugc">@izzyb</a>, I can’t say definitively, but in my experience on both phone and computer, if you right-click (or the equivalent of that on a touch-screen) on a photo, one of the things that comes up as options is “details” or “properties” and that should have the specs listed in it. I don’t have Apple products so I’m not sure if that’s the case on you&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-10556"><a href="https://www.lenspiration.com/forums/topic/water-fall/#post-38539" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">7642e47b8402089c35b26225afd0bca8</guid>
				<title>James Staddon replied to the topic Water fall in the forum Photo Critique</title>
				<link>https://www.lenspiration.com/forums/topic/water-fall/#post-38488</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 09 Apr 2019 21:20:44 -0400</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, you really captured the &#8220;spectacularity&#8221; of that falls, <a href="https://www.lenspiration.com/members/izzyb/" rel="nofollow ugc">@izzyb</a>! Great first attempt at silky water. Like <a href="https://www.lenspiration.com/members/bennett-family/" rel="nofollow ugc">@bennett-family</a> said, sometimes a slower shutter speed will make the silky water effect look more intentional. I do like being able to see the texture in this falls, especially the texture at the bottom, and you don&#8217;t want it to look like&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-10551"><a href="https://www.lenspiration.com/forums/topic/water-fall/#post-38488" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">97cd74b95fba7c55bbd90ab0014fe08e</guid>
				<title>Lyd-B replied to the topic Water fall in the forum Photo Critique</title>
				<link>https://www.lenspiration.com/forums/topic/water-fall/#post-38455</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 08 Apr 2019 22:54:15 -0400</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://www.lenspiration.com/members/izzyb/" rel="nofollow ugc">@izzyb</a></p>
<p>Welcome to the forums, Liz!</p>
<p>Those are some nice falls! You did alot better at your first silky water attempt than I did on mine! It looks like it wouldn&#8217;t have hurt to have a slightly slower shutter speed &#8211; the falls look somewhat silky smooth, but I think there&#8217;s still a bit too much texture in them. I also do notice some blown out&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-10544"><a href="https://www.lenspiration.com/forums/topic/water-fall/#post-38455" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>