<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Lenspiration | tjons | Activity</title>
	<link>https://www.lenspiration.com/members/tjons/activity/</link>
	<atom:link href="https://www.lenspiration.com/members/tjons/activity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Activity feed for tjons.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2026 23:30:42 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>https://buddypress.org/?v=</generator>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<ttl>30</ttl>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>2</sy:updateFrequency>
	
						<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">2048175cf37dce25a2fe6e8f59360e3b</guid>
				<title>tjons replied to the topic Banded Longhorn Beetle Macro in the forum Photo Critique</title>
				<link>https://www.lenspiration.com/forums/topic/banded-longhorn-beetle-macro/#post-12387</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2015 03:10:33 -0400</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://www.lenspiration.com/members/jamesstaddon/" rel="nofollow ugc">@jamesstaddon</a>, Macro&#8217;s a lot of fun. I <em>highly</em> recommend it! Macro lenses can be had rather inexpensively as well, so that&#8217;s always nice! I will look forward to seeing what you make with it if you get one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">df05622dab6d1b06924addc56f70a093</guid>
				<title>tjons replied to the topic Car Wheel in the forum Photo Critique</title>
				<link>https://www.lenspiration.com/forums/topic/car-wheel/#post-12385</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2015 02:58:18 -0400</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey <a href="https://www.lenspiration.com/members/joseph/" rel="nofollow ugc">@Joseph</a>! This looks great, and I&#8217;m really impressed. Your composition is nice and dynamic, as the diagonal slant of the car lines suggests movement. The wheel is in focus, and it seems like you were implementing the rule of thirds somewhat. That being said, though, the wheel looks in focus, but not sharp. Perhaps you want to try sharpening&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-1263"><a href="https://www.lenspiration.com/forums/topic/car-wheel/#post-12385" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">fda3b09d59e86c176d46ba476a414418</guid>
				<title>tjons replied to the topic Banded Longhorn Beetle Macro in the forum Photo Critique</title>
				<link>https://www.lenspiration.com/forums/topic/banded-longhorn-beetle-macro/#post-12299</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 26 Jul 2015 00:59:58 -0400</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would say that it depends on the lens. Most are good for normal shooting as well, although they may have slow AF. My dream Canon MP-E 65 (see link above) and other super-macro (greater than 1:1 magnification) lenses cannot usually be used for normal shooting, although there are some <a href="http://www.bhphotovideo.com/bnh/controller/home?O=&amp;sku=1128063&amp;gclid=Cj0KEQjw58ytBRDMg-HVn4LuqasBEiQAhPkhutkt3eOC9L2KbMSUw3dT-JenxRWxI1r4CRAU5fw-zEcaAvEx8P8HAQ&amp;is=REG&amp;m=Y&amp;A=details&amp;Q=" rel="nofollow ugc">exceptions</a>.</p>
<p>A macro prime lens could take a good landscape&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-1232"><a href="https://www.lenspiration.com/forums/topic/banded-longhorn-beetle-macro/#post-12299" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">91e904d48a62a102e0a0ba58e7ec3774</guid>
				<title>tjons replied to the topic Banded Longhorn Beetle Macro in the forum Photo Critique</title>
				<link>https://www.lenspiration.com/forums/topic/banded-longhorn-beetle-macro/#post-12299</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 26 Jul 2015 00:59:58 -0400</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would say that it depends on the lens. Most are good for normal shooting as well, although they may have slow AF. My dream Canon MP-E 65 (see link above) and other super-macro (greater than 1:1 magnification) lenses cannot usually be used for normal shooting, although there are some <a href="http://www.bhphotovideo.com/bnh/controller/home?O=&amp;sku=1128063&amp;gclid=Cj0KEQjw58ytBRDMg-HVn4LuqasBEiQAhPkhutkt3eOC9L2KbMSUw3dT-JenxRWxI1r4CRAU5fw-zEcaAvEx8P8HAQ&amp;is=REG&amp;m=Y&amp;A=details&amp;Q=" rel="nofollow ugc">exceptions</a>.</p>
<p>A macro prime lens could make a good landscape&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-1231"><a href="https://www.lenspiration.com/forums/topic/banded-longhorn-beetle-macro/#post-12299" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">959356b5557dca718a0497fa2fb5b381</guid>
				<title>tjons replied to the topic Banded Longhorn Beetle Macro in the forum Photo Critique</title>
				<link>https://www.lenspiration.com/forums/topic/banded-longhorn-beetle-macro/#post-12291</link>
				<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2015 20:04:11 -0400</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://www.lenspiration.com/members/abbie/" rel="nofollow ugc">@Abbie</a> <a href="https://www.lenspiration.com/members/thefarmhand/" rel="nofollow ugc">@thefarmhand</a> I agree. I wish I had gotten some more of this bug in focus. I don&#8217;t know if either of you have had the opportunity to work with a 1:1 true macro lens, but I can tell you that depth of field is usually REALLY thin.</p>
<p>thefarmhand, I actually shot this with my Sigma EX DG 105mm f/2.8 macro lens. With magnification being at approx.&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-1226"><a href="https://www.lenspiration.com/forums/topic/banded-longhorn-beetle-macro/#post-12291" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">281cfc1ec5de67414537e27be7b481e1</guid>
				<title>tjons replied to the topic Banded Longhorn Beetle Macro in the forum Photo Critique</title>
				<link>https://www.lenspiration.com/forums/topic/banded-longhorn-beetle-macro/#post-12291</link>
				<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2015 20:04:11 -0400</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://www.lenspiration.com/members/abbie/" rel="nofollow ugc">@Abbie</a> <a href="https://www.lenspiration.com/members/thefarmhand/" rel="nofollow ugc">@thefarmhand</a> I agree. I wish I had gotten some more of this bug in focus. I don&#8217;t know if either of you have had the opportunity to work with a 1:1 true macro lens, but I can tell you that depth of field is usually REALLY thin.</p>
<p>thefarmhand, I actually shot this with my Sigma EX DG 105mm f/2.8 macro lens. With magnification being at approx.&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-1225"><a href="https://www.lenspiration.com/forums/topic/banded-longhorn-beetle-macro/#post-12291" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">3fadd95478efa34d1845d9e3de028f8c</guid>
				<title>tjons started the topic Banded Longhorn Beetle Macro in the forum Photo Critique</title>
				<link>https://www.lenspiration.com/forums/topic/banded-longhorn-beetle-macro/</link>
				<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2015 00:42:14 -0400</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I took this picture of a banded longhorn beetle (<em>Typocerus velutinus</em>) today, sitting on some Queen Anne&#8217;s Lace today. Any thoughts?</p>
<p>Canon 7D<br />
105mm<br />
f/14<br />
1/50<br />
Tripod (I think)<br />
Approximately 0.9x life-size magnification</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">72c3f3f6f38726e642ad6ffa9e801bfe</guid>
				<title>tjons replied to the topic Grumpy toad in the forum Photo Critique</title>
				<link>https://www.lenspiration.com/forums/topic/grumpy-toad/#post-11291</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2015 02:35:31 -0400</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you, all. I think the consensus is that I should have used a narrower aperture. I agree, and hope I remember next time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">49585f80f21ded30e7cb6bb1433773dd</guid>
				<title>tjons replied to the topic SOLD - Pentax K-5 with 50mm F/2 in the forum Photography Q&#038;A</title>
				<link>https://www.lenspiration.com/forums/topic/for-sale-pentax-k-5-with-50mm-f2/#post-11243</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2015 00:54:50 -0400</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What did you upgrade to?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">35d97d5863fa35948f65d928e5fed84f</guid>
				<title>tjons started the topic Grumpy toad in the forum Photo Critique</title>
				<link>https://www.lenspiration.com/forums/topic/grumpy-toad/</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2015 01:08:50 -0400</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I took this picture of one of my little brother&#8217;s toads. Any thoughts?</p>
<p>Canon 7D<br />
105mm<br />
F/4.0<br />
1/1000<br />
ISO 500</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">87e8a200298c7e3a19ddf888b9b7c8a0</guid>
				<title>tjons started the topic Grumpy toad in the forum Photo Critique</title>
				<link>https://www.lenspiration.com/forums/topic/grumpy-toad/</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2015 01:08:50 -0400</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I took this picture of one of my little brother&#8217;s toads.</p>
<p>Canon 7D<br />
105mm<br />
F/4.0<br />
1/1000<br />
ISO 500</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>