FWIW, I believe that @JamesStaddon has the 70-200 f/4 if I’m not mistaken. He’ll have to confirm that for sure. Obviously it will work for portraits, it just won’t give the $1800 “look” that the f/2.8 version does. 🙂
FWIW, I believe that @JamesStaddon has the 70-200 f/4 if I’m not mistaken. He’ll have to confirm that for sure. Obviously it will work for portraits, it just won’t give the $1800 “look” that the f/2.8 version does. 🙂