@thefarmhand
I am a God fearing photographer, and I live on the east coast of Virginia (not the Eastern Shore though). I have done a lot of nature photography, as well as working for a professional locally. I have covered several events, such as tour groups, dinners, seminars, and receptions. I live on a farm, and I love life on it. I like playing bluegrass on my fiddle and guitar, and I play accordion and piano as well. I do everything from milking goats and chasing cows, to baling hay. I am the oldest of the six kids in my family.
Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
May 16, 2017 at 7:06 pm #23413
thefarmhandParticipantI’m not James, but I would recommend shooting @ f/8 and using a slower shutter speed. I would have composed the first image a little differently. I would have swung the whole camera towards the bottom right corner of your frame, putting the tree line and rock line on the rule of thirds.
December 7, 2016 at 6:43 am #20171
thefarmhandParticipantI found this on a Moultrie review website….
Megapixel Ratings:
In the past, many people get confused with the megapixel rating trail camera manufacturers advertise. Companies inflate the mpxl rating to attract eyes to their products. They do this through interpolation, which digitally adds megapixels to a photo without actually improving the picture.
The best way to judge picture quality is to look at actual pictures. You will notice this the most when you zoom in on a full-size image that a camera has taken. The details of the photo will appear hazy or even digitized. This is normal, and to be expected.”
December 7, 2016 at 6:16 am #20170
thefarmhandParticipantYeah @buddingphotographer, Reading the license plate is the important thing here, so that’s why I was asking. It seemed like there was a lot of extra pixels in the car’s plate that makes it difficult to read. I’ll try to run a test next time I get ahold of the cameras.
December 6, 2016 at 7:09 am #20154
thefarmhandParticipantI’m pretty sure the reason they’re the same size is they got re-sized to go onto Drive. That particular camera is this guy: https://www.walmart.com/ip/Moultrie-D-900i-10MP-No-Glow-IR-HD-Video-with-Sound-Color-View-Screen/46542939
I’ll have to run a few tests and see what the difference is exactly.December 5, 2016 at 7:48 pm #20149
thefarmhandParticipantHey @melaniethomsen, I was just curious… The CD title is “Looking Upwards”. I found it interesting that the photo is actually “looking downwards” at the harp. Just sparked my interest.
- This reply was modified 56 years, 7 months ago by .
August 5, 2016 at 10:49 am #18547
thefarmhandParticipant@Joshua Ong, Yes. You should definitely take it into account for both the background and the placement of the subject in portraiture.
August 2, 2016 at 5:44 am #18474
thefarmhandParticipantOkay @Mirandawaite, I’m attaching some images that I grabbed online. They demonstrate the rule of thirds. Basically, our eyes are drawn to photos that have the subject on one of the lines you will see in those images. It’s easy to find these in your Lightroom crop tool as well.
August 2, 2016 at 5:30 am #18471
thefarmhandParticipantJuly 31, 2016 at 8:11 pm #18363
thefarmhandParticipantOn second thought, I think I’m going to recommend editing it a little bit more heavily too. Next time I’m near my computer I’ll try to show you what I mean. BTW, it is a really nice photo idea.
July 31, 2016 at 8:01 pm #18362
thefarmhandParticipantHey @mirandawaite! I remember you from Taccoa. I had some similar thoughts as the ones mentioned by others on here, but I would add one other idea. Did you consider processing this as a black and white image to bring out texture and details? That’s probably something I would try.
I don’t know what the scenery was like, but sometimes you can make a cool composition by shooting wide along the edge of a field (creating a “leading line” to the horizon), with a wheat grain head as the subject up close in the lower right rule of thirds “crosshairs”.
August 1, 2015 at 11:03 am #12498
thefarmhandParticipantAugust 1, 2015 at 5:20 am #12496
thefarmhandParticipant@Abbie, Yeah, there’s a lot of farmland. Besides that, it’s mostly retired people who did well in life and wanted to live on a quiet place on the water. It’s mainly waterfront property around here.
July 31, 2015 at 9:22 am #12467
thefarmhandParticipant@Abbie, The water I took a photo of the first time was off of one of our points. I live on the Chesapeake Bay in southern VA. The second photo was from a farm the next creek over from mine. The creeks around here are all saltwater, and are usually about 50-100 yrds. wide. The second photo looked out onto the saltwater North river, which is about a mile wide. Around here rivers/creeks don’t “flow” because they are tidal. (Hence why you thought it was a pond…) In my county, wherever you are, 80% of the time you are within 1/2 mile of a creek/river/bay. So we live on the water, because our county sticks out in it! 🙂
Attached is the view from my backyard.
July 30, 2015 at 9:50 pm #12465
thefarmhandParticipantAnd @Abbie, about a earlier post you made, there’s no need to be sorry about pointing out my mistakes. I love critical review, that’s a lot of what makes all photographers better. I make plenty of them, and that’s partly why I’m on these forums. :D.
July 30, 2015 at 9:39 pm #12464
thefarmhandParticipant@Abbie, I think that photo is pretty good, and I like the depth of field. Were you focusing on the flowers, or the morning glory leaves? If it was the leaves, you might be able to mess around with the rule of thirds and move your camera so they are in the bottom left “crosshairs”. Great spot to take a photo! I don’t have any streams or “waterfalls” where I live.
-
AuthorPosts





